Friday, November 4, 2011

Life with and without Facebook

I started out with a simple question, ‘What is your view on facebook? is it a good thing or a bad?’ and that termed out this entire post. Not that this entire post tends to just answer the above question, but it does attempt to go deep into the wounds caused by social networking, and facebook in common. Well, it would be pretty naïve to jump to a conclusion this early, nevertheless it would be my bad if you don’t feel so after having read this. I got many answers to the questions, some termed a social networking site to be a social networking site, and that it can’t be tagged good or bad; the answer was reasonable enough, but not to the point.

However, if we travel deep into the question to help answer it, we might well get entangled with the many viewpoints of the different walks of life. The elderly may say, ‘the young ones gotta go out to the streets and play’, the office bosses may say, ‘make those fingers work godspeed, I want the assignment submitted on my desk in five minutes!’, the ones who still wanna illogically contradict may say, ‘social networking is social networking, there is nothing good or bad,’ but all these are better said than explained.

Getting to the point, we often notice that people on facebook are all good to us. Everyone! Its like some post-world war agreement signed between two countries; everyone is so good to us, even the worst of our enemies. Bottomline is that we all want to look good in front of the masses, we all fancy diplomacy. But the truth is, well, chuck!

To get deeper into this issue, lets go back to stone age perhaps, where everyone worked hard to build relationships. The primitive men might just laugh at us and call us fools for living two lives (social networking and real), we might just do the vice versa, but the point stays and the question comes back: Is facebook good or bad?

Let’s just put ourselves in a situation; we can’t imagine ourselves without technology though, it wouldn’t be possible for us to go through the renaissance and waste four hundred years doing nothing. Let’s imagine ourselves with the TV, the computers, the internet and all that there is now, except for social networking, okay? So here’s how the drill goes, we wake up every morning, watch some local news as we butter up some toast and take rounds of our room, finding our socks, shoes and hanky in the bargain. We then go out, well dressed, meet Mr. Brown mowing his lawns, say hello and talk about how Mr. Green who lived down the street, managed to fly his family to Rome on a family vacation. Then look into the wrist watch, see the hands ticking a little over 7:45 and bid our pleasantries to walk our own ways. We then somehow manage to check into office after having taken the bus-route to there and take a few modest comments from the manager. We then take a lot of crap all through the day from the work put onto us by the manager and return, fully famished. We then go sit on the sofa and do a little leftover paper work. A friend maybe calls on our phone and calls us over to the local bar to grab a few beers and chat, we oblige. At the end, we retreat on bed, looking at the day, cursing the manager for pressure, the canteen staff for the room-temperature coffees and the warm slushies. But then we smile when we think about the round of talks over beer, the drunken conflict, the drunken fight that could only grow funnier, and so many other things that we can’t even remember of.

Now let’s see how the drill with facebook fares. We get up in the morning, log in to see how many notifications we’ve got overnight:

1. Dhanushri Mehta likes your album: ‘GOA-2010’. (You smile)

2. Shikha Barua (your crush) likes your status: ‘If I could reach up and hold a star for every time you've made me smile, the entire evening sky would be in the palm of my hand’. (You smile and blush)

3. Shikha Barua (your crush again) commented on your status: ‘hmm J’ (Your smile grows up wider and you hold the arms of your chair and grow taller in your seat)

4. Jane Woolchuck (acquanted friend from Green Bay Wisconsin) sent you a request in farmville. (You jump up from the seat with a wider smile and want to do something different, but decide to continue facebooking)

Then at 7:30 you realise that you need to be in office at 8:00. You rush up, gargle your mouth, spray some mint, tuck yourself into an already worn coat and hit the streets. You see Mr. Brown mowing the lawns, but have no time to stop by. You reach office late, get helluva scoldings from the manager for not having completed the leftover work, your day goes terribly bad as the added up paper work from yesterday makes the paperwork today look like its gonna make you write the Mahabharata. The room-temperature coffee and warm slushy worsens the day. You then return home and straightaway attack the pc and log in. You check the notification:

1. Dhanushri Mehta commented on your status ‘you’re mine’: ‘heheh :P’ (You’re motionless)

2. Shikha Barua also commented on your status: ‘WHAT??!’ (You’re frozen, motionless)

3. Jane Woolchuck sent you truffles for your pigs on farmville. (You’re frozen 10 degree celsuis, motionless)

Just then your friend calls you up, you respond and he calls you over to the bar down the street for some beer. You join him and goes good. Then, finally, you are left with yourself on your bed. You are looking back at the day and it finally ends with a smile, thinking about the beer at the bar. But then it all goes away when he remembers of his incomplete paperwork. He rushes to do whatever he can and leaves the rest to all the scoldings he’s again gonna get.

We’ll this is just an assumption, not reality. It might be annoying as well, but I couldn’t see a better way of explaining my point. Why go do something so often when we are better off without it? Why complicate our lives so much when we can live our lives much simpler and yet enjoy?

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Two scales of Human Development: WYTYA and WYRA



Human development is usually hindered by a various number of
phenomena. One of the main reasons can be identified as ignorance; ignorance of
a human being towards human development. Often it happens that humans as social
beings ignore the self development and stress on various other factors such as
money, etc. In fact, money is ultimately or indirectly dependant on self
development.
When it comes to self development, it basically comes to measuring our own self and making some real time calculations. Basically, there are two scales, namely,
1. WYRA (what you really are)
2. WYTYA (what you think you are)
Human beings mostly assume the WYTYA to be the WYRA which
can be misleading and that brings a lot of complexity to the real life doings,
mainly failures. WYRA is a scale that measures what you really are, i.e. the
actual potentialities that a human being possesses, the ones that he/she is
aware or not aware of. WYTA is a very important scale in the human life as
ignorance of this scale can virtually kill the person in the real world. The
person can get subjected to the adverse effects of competition, etc.
WYTYA on the other hand is the scale which tells the person
what he/she thinks he/she is, i.e. the potentialities that a person has
fallaciously accepted to be his/her own. This incidence can occur as a result
of many factors, most of them accounting for miscalculations or no proper
assessments of the individual self. In simple words, when a person ignores all
the factors in life and only stresses on the wealth factor, he tends to relate
the wealth factor to other relevant factors that can bring him closer to the
wealth factor as the wealth factor is an independent factor in its own. The other
relevant factors that the individual chooses decides the WYTYA scale.
Sometimes, the person maybe illogical and put various other strengths into his
assessment to count into his potents, whereas the strength stands nowhere in
his WYRA. Now this strength again may be counted as own due to many other
factors, such as,
1. Peer Pressure.
2. Universal Applicability: This is basically when a person feels that this particular strength will be more effective in the real world in comparison with the others.
3. Unconscious Acceptability: This is when the person accepts the strength without his conscious consent, in other words, it is brought upon him by his surroundings.
WYTYA can get dangerous when a person accepts more
unacceptable strengths in opposition to his WYRA. This can be so as a person
accepting new strengths will stress more upon his acquired strengths rather than
his actual strengths n the entire WYTYA scale can go into reverse WYRA.
Hence, WYTYA scale of life is higher than WYRA when a person
accepts significant amount of strengths into his potentials, and WYRA scale of
life is higher than WYTYA when the person stresses only on his strengths rather
than accepting any new strengths.
WYTYA > WYRA = negative effects
WYTYA < WYRA = positive effects.
It may also be noted that WYTYA and WYRA scales never are
equivalent to each other. Let us conclude with the imaginary schedule given above.

Monday, October 31, 2011

Change and Improvement - A Psychological View

Change in a person is natural. Every living person is subject to change, no matter how much the person tries to stay the same. Change is influenced from many incidents occuring in the individuals life and often it comes from unconsciousness of the person. Change is part of nature and very important for development of the society.

We, as individuals, find it really easy to bring certain changes in us that can bring distraught to others, but when it comes to seeing the similar changes in them, it brings us the same feeling.
Change, all in all, is healthy for social animals. Its our duty that we accept the things that go well with us and reject the ones that don’t go as well. Rejection is simply on the matter of fact that there is something better that lies ahead, better than what we were with, or something that will improve the way we live, rather than change. This kind of change from our perspective is called improvement.

Improvement and change are poles apart in the psychological world. Improvement is something that a human being does from inside which benefits him/her and brings change from the outside which is a dependant factor; whereas change is altogether different, as change done from the interior can have good effects, but on the whole it affects the mind adversely. That leads to negative change from the outside, unlike improvement which brings positive change. This negative change from the outside can be seen in a dire perspective by the person who has a communicative exchange with the person who has undergone this negative change.
We, as social animals, need to understand this difference between negative change and positive change, brought about by their respective internal factors. It normally occurs that we ‘change’ rather than ‘improve’; no doubt, change at times can bring quick results when compared to improvement, but its adverse effects are equally as devastating when looked upon in the long-term view.

Change can also deteriorate, as a contradictory reaction. Unlike negative change brought about from internal change, this is interior change itself that can go totally wrong and cause overwhelming negativity in exterior change. Change, when not well controlled, or change when undertaken by a psychologically weak mind, can cause deterioration. When man is unable or impotent in controlling change, that is, when man has no control over his psychological self and undergoes change, the results can be devastating and the overall exterior change can drop alarmingly to take his psychology to near zero, or mostly minus zero.

The above factors can however be controlled by administration by another social being with a strong mind.